When operating with Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) and Distributed Power Management (DPM), what two statements explain the impact of disabling vSphere High Availability admission control? (Choose two.)

Question

Accepted Answer

A. DRS will evacuate virtual machines from hosts and places in maintenance or standby modes Without admission control enforcing failover slot reservations, DRS is permitted to fully evacuate VMs from hosts and place those hosts into maintenance or DPM standby mode without restriction. B. Vmware DPM will place hosts in standby mode even if doing so violates failover requirements. Without admission control, DPM has no failover capacity threshold to check before powering down a host, so it will place hosts in standby even if doing so reduces the cluster's ability to tolerate host failures.

Answer

C. DRS does not evacuate virtual machines from a host for the purpose of placing it in This describes DRS behavior when admission control is ENABLED - DRS refrains from evacuating hosts if doing so would violate the configured failover capacity.

Answer

D. VMware DPM does not place hosts in standby mode if doing so would violate failover This describes DPM behavior when admission control is ENABLED - DPM skips standby placement for hosts whose removal would breach the failover policy.

When operating with Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) and Distributed Power Management (DPM), what two statements explain the impact of disabling vSphere High Availability admission control? (Choos

Question

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion