nerdexam
Broadcom-VMware

2V0-13.24 · Question #24

The following requirements were identified in an architecture workshop for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) design project utilizing vSAN for its primary storage solution: REQ001: Application must…

The correct answer is D. Trigger a failure of an ESXi host. To validate the stated requirements, the test scenario must address all three: application performance (1,000 TPS), automatic DRS and HA functionality, and maintenance timing (implying minimal disruption during business hours). In a VCF environment with vSAN, test scenarios…

Section 3 – Plan VMware Cloud Foundation Solutions

Question

The following requirements were identified in an architecture workshop for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) design project utilizing vSAN for its primary storage solution:

REQ001: Application must maintain a minimum of 1,000 transactions per second (TPS) during business hours excluding disaster recovery (DR) scenarios. REQ002: Automatic DRS and HA must be utilized. REQ003: Planned maintenance must be executed outside of business hours. Which of the following test scenarios should be added and performed to validate these requirements?

Options

  • ATrigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operation.
  • BTrigger a vCenter Server update.
  • CTrigger a vSAN disk group evacuation.
  • DTrigger a failure of an ESXi host.

How the community answered

(22 responses)
  • A
    5% (1)
  • B
    9% (2)
  • D
    86% (19)

Explanation

To validate the stated requirements, the test scenario must address all three: application performance (1,000 TPS), automatic DRS and HA functionality, and maintenance timing (implying minimal disruption during business hours). In a VCF environment with vSAN, test scenarios should simulate real-world conditions that challenge these requirements. Let's evaluate each Option A: Trigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operation vMotion tests DRS's ability to migrate VMs for load balancing, which aligns with REQ002's "automatic DRS" mandate. It can be scheduled outside business hours (REQ003) to minimize impact. However, it doesn't fully test HA (automatic failover) or ensure 1,000 TPS (REQ001) under failure conditions, as vMotion is a planned operation, not a failure scenario. This is a partial match but not comprehensive. Option B: Trigger a vCenter Server update Updating vCenter tests management plane resilience but doesn't directly validate application performance (REQ001), DRS/HA automation (REQ002), or vSAN-specific behavior. While it could relate to maintenance (REQ003), it's unrelated to workload or storage functionality in the VCF design, making it irrelevant here. Option C: Trigger a vSAN disk group evacuation Evacuating a vSAN disk group simulates maintenance (REQ003) by moving data to other nodes, testing vSAN's resilience. It may involve DRS for VM migration (REQ002), but it doesn't trigger HA failover. While it could indirectly affect TPS (REQ001), the requirement excludes DR scenarios, and this test doesn't guarantee performance validation during business hours under normal operations or host failure. Option D: Trigger a failure of an ESXi host Simulating an ESXi host failure directly tests REQ002: HA automatically restarts VMs on other hosts, and DRS balances the load post-failure. In a vSAN environment, it also validates data availability (vSAN rebuilds objects), ensuring 1,000 TPS (REQ001) is maintained during business hours under failure conditions (excluding DR, as this is a single-host failure within a site). While not a maintenance task (REQ003), it implicitly ensures maintenance-like disruptions (e.g., host failure) don't violate performance, aligning with VCF's HA/DRS automation goals. The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide recommends host failure testing to validate HA and vSAN resilience.

Topics

#test validation#TPS performance#DRS HA#vSAN

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 2V0-13.24 Practice