2V0-13.24 · Question #94
A customer is deploying VCF at a new datacenter location. They will migrate their workloads from the existing datacenter to the new VCF platform over six months. Both datacenters will run…
The correct answer is A. Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration. In VCF design, risks are potential issues that could jeopardize project success, documented to prompt mitigation planning. Option A, "Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration," is a valid risk because workload migration complexity (e.g., application…
Question
A customer is deploying VCF at a new datacenter location. They will migrate their workloads from the existing datacenter to the new VCF platform over six months. Both datacenters will run simultaneously for six months during the migration. Which of the following should be a documented risk?
Options
- ASix months may not be enough time to complete the migration.
- BThere will be connectivity between the two locations.
- CBandwidth between the two locations is sufficient to accommodate the workload migration.
- DWorkloads will be powered off during migration.
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A80% (32)
- B3% (1)
- C5% (2)
- D13% (5)
Explanation
In VCF design, risks are potential issues that could jeopardize project success, documented to prompt mitigation planning. Option A, "Six months may not be enough time to complete the migration," is a valid risk because workload migration complexity (e.g., application dependencies, data volume, testing) could exceed the timeline, a common challenge in VCF deployments. Option B (connectivity) is a fact, not a risk, unless qualified as unreliable. Option C (sufficient bandwidth) is an assumption or requirement, not a risk unless proven inadequate. Option D (powering off workloads) is a design choice, not an inherent risk without evidence. VCF migration planning emphasizes timeline risks, making A the best choice.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.