200-401 · Question #39
Given a ring topology, which loop prevention mechanism provides the fastest reconvergence time after a link failure?
The correct answer is B. Resilient Ethernet Protocol. Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP) is purpose-built for ring topologies and achieves sub-50ms reconvergence by precomputing alternate paths and immediately unblocking a pre-designated port when a link failure is detected - no election or re-calculation delay is needed. Why the…
Question
Given a ring topology, which loop prevention mechanism provides the fastest reconvergence time after a link failure?
Options
- ARapid Per-VLAN Spanning Tree Protocol
- BResilient Ethernet Protocol
- CMultiple Spanning Tree Protocol
- DSpanning Tree Protocol
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A17% (7)
- B71% (29)
- C7% (3)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP) is purpose-built for ring topologies and achieves sub-50ms reconvergence by precomputing alternate paths and immediately unblocking a pre-designated port when a link failure is detected - no election or re-calculation delay is needed.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A (Rapid PVST+): Faster than classic STP (typically 1–2 seconds), but not optimized for rings and carries per-VLAN overhead that slows reconvergence compared to REP.
- C (MST): Groups VLANs into instances for scalability, but convergence speed is comparable to RSTP - it offers no ring-specific optimization.
- D (STP): The slowest option, with convergence taking 30–50 seconds due to timer-based state transitions (listening → learning → forwarding).
Memory tip: Think "REP = Ring's Emergency Protocol" - it's the only one in the list designed for rings, so when you see "ring topology + fastest reconvergence," REP is always the answer. The STP family (STP, RSTP, PVST+, MST) was built for general Ethernet switching, not ring-specific recovery.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.