200-301 · Question #909
200-301 Question #909: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
The correct answer is A: R1(config)#ip route 10.10.13.10 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.6. To force traffic only between specific hosts to use a new dedicated circuit, host-specific static routes must be configured on the routers, pointing to the next-hop on the new circuit.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. The image server and client A are running an application that transfers an extremely high volume of data between the two. An engineer is configuring a dedicated circuit between R1 and R2. Which set of commands must the engineer apply to the routers so that only traffic between the image server and client A is forces to use the new circuit?
Options
- AR1(config)#ip route 10.10.13.10 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.6
- BR1(config)#ip route 10.10.13.10 255.255.255.128 10.10.10.6
- CR1(config)#ip route 10.10.13.10 255.255.255.252 10.10.10.6
- DR1(config)#ip route 10.10.13.10 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.2
Explanation
To force traffic only between specific hosts to use a new dedicated circuit, host-specific static routes must be configured on the routers, pointing to the next-hop on the new circuit.
Common mistakes.
- B. Using a
/25mask (255.255.255.128) creates a network route that covers a range of IP addresses, not just the specific host. This would force more traffic than just the Image Server's to use the new circuit, violating the 'only traffic between' requirement. - C. Using a
/30mask (255.255.255.252) creates a network route that covers a range of IP addresses, not just the specific host. This would force more traffic than just the Image Server's to use the new circuit, violating the 'only traffic between' requirement. - D. While a host route (
255.255.255.255) is correct for specificity, the specified next-hop10.10.10.2contradicts the implied correct next-hop10.10.10.6for the dedicated circuit, as indicated by the correct answer.
Concept tested. Static host routing for policy-based forwarding
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.