nerdexam
CiscoCisco

200-301 · Question #776

200-301 Question #776: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

The correct answer is A: It can lead to overloaded resources on the router.. Using permit any in a NAT access list can indiscriminately translate all internal traffic, potentially overwhelming the router's resources by creating an excessive number of NAT translation entries.

Submitted by anna_se· Mar 5, 2026

Question

What is the danger of the permit any entry in a NAT access list?

Options

  • AIt can lead to overloaded resources on the router.
  • BIt can cause too many addresses to be assigned to the same interface.
  • CIt can disable the overload command.
  • DIt prevents the correct translation of IP addresses on the inside network.

Explanation

Using permit any in a NAT access list can indiscriminately translate all internal traffic, potentially overwhelming the router's resources by creating an excessive number of NAT translation entries.

Common mistakes.

  • B. NAT translates addresses, it doesn't assign too many addresses to an interface; the issue is with the number of translations or exhaustion of the translation pool.
  • C. permit any does not disable the overload command; rather, it expands the scope of addresses that will be subject to the overload function.
  • D. permit any actually ensures all IP addresses specified by the ACL are translated, so it would not prevent correct translation, but rather could lead to unwanted or resource-intensive translation.

Concept tested. NAT access list security and resource management

Reference. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-3s/nat-xe-3s-book/ipnat-cfg-nat-ovrld-fr.html

Topics

#NAT#ACLs#PAT#Resource Exhaustion

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 200-301 PracticeBrowse All 200-301 Questions