200-301 · Question #35
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is bringing up a new circuit to the MPLS provider on the Gi0/1 interface of Router1. The new circuit uses eBGP and teams the route to VLAN25 from the BGP path. What i
The correct answer is B. Route 10.10.13.0/25 is updated in the routing table as being learned from interface Gi0/1.. You need to assume that the routing table listed is before the change. And that the eBGP route will be the installed route after the change due to lower AD. The new eBGP route will be added to the routing table. eBGP has an administrative distance of 20 while OSPF has an administ
Question
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is bringing up a new circuit to the MPLS provider on the Gi0/1 interface of Router1. The new circuit uses eBGP and teams the route to VLAN25 from the BGP path. What is the expected behavior for the traffic flow for route 10.10.13.0/25?
Exhibits
Options
- ATraffic to 10.10.13.0.25 is load balanced out of multiple interfaces
- BRoute 10.10.13.0/25 is updated in the routing table as being learned from interface Gi0/1.
- CTraffic to 10.10.13.0/25 is a symmetrical
- DRoute 10.10.13.0/25 learned via the GiO/0 interface remains in the routing table
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A23% (8)
- B60% (21)
- C6% (2)
- D11% (4)
Explanation
You need to assume that the routing table listed is before the change. And that the eBGP route will be the installed route after the change due to lower AD. The new eBGP route will be added to the routing table. eBGP has an administrative distance of 20 while OSPF has an administrative distance of 110. The new route will be preferred for sending traffic to 10.10.13.0/25. The existing OSPF route will turn into a floating route and not appear in the routing table.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.

