1Z0-820 · Question #49
The core dump configuration for your system is: A user is running a process in the global zone and the process crashes. The process information is: User1 2663 2618 0 17:46:42 pts/2 0:00…
The correct answer is A. core.bash.2663.global. Option A is correct because in Solaris coreadm, the per-process core file pattern uses the zone name (%z token = "global") - not the hostname - and it is written to the process's current working directory with no path prefix, yielding the format core.<name>.<pid>.<zone>. Why…
Question
The core dump configuration for your system is:
A user is running a process in the global zone and the process crashes. The process information is:
User1 2663 2618 0 17:46:42 pts/2 0:00 /usr/bin/bash The server host name is: zeus What will the per-process core file be named?
Exhibit
Options
- Acore.bash.2663.global
- Bcore.bash.2663.zeus
- C/var/core/core.bash.2663
- D/var/core/core.bash.2663.global
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A77% (20)
- B8% (2)
- C12% (3)
- D4% (1)
Explanation
Option A is correct because in Solaris coreadm, the per-process core file pattern uses the zone name (%z token = "global") - not the hostname - and it is written to the process's current working directory with no path prefix, yielding the format core.<name>.<pid>.<zone>.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- B substitutes the server hostname ("zeus") for the zone name; hostnames appear with the
%htoken, which is not part of this per-process pattern. - C uses the
/var/core/directory, which is the global (system-wide) core file path, and it omits the zone suffix entirely. - D mixes both mistakes by combining the global path prefix (
/var/core/) with the correct zone suffix - it describes neither the per-process format nor the global format exactly.
Memory tip: Think "per-process = no path, zone not host." If you see /var/core/ in the answer, it's the global core pattern. If you see the hostname instead of the zone name, it's a distractor swapping %h for %z.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
