nerdexam
Citrix

1Y0-204 · Question #83

A Citrix Administrator complains that between the two rewrite policies bound to the vserver, only one policy, whichever has lower priority, works. The other policy is never used. Click the 'Exhibit'…

The correct answer is C. The Policy expression of the no_chunk_pol is `true' and `NOT HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID'. The issue is caused by the policy expression of the no_chunk_pol being true' and NOT HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID'. This means that the policy will always be true and thus, always be invoked, preventing the other policy from being used. This is explained in the Citrix Virtual Apps and…

Monitoring and Troubleshooting

Question

A Citrix Administrator complains that between the two rewrite policies bound to the vserver, only one policy, whichever has lower priority, works. The other policy is never used. Click the ‘Exhibit’ button to view the screenshot of the relevant policy binding. What is the cause of the issue?

Exhibit

1Y0-204 question #83 exhibit

Options

  • AThe Invoke label is NOT configured.
  • BGotoExpression value for Policy RP_remove_srv_header is configured as `END'.
  • CThe Policy expression of the no_chunk_pol is true' and NOT HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID'.
  • DThe Priority of the no_chunk_pol is a higher numeric value than 100.

How the community answered

(50 responses)
  • A
    2% (1)
  • B
    10% (5)
  • C
    84% (42)
  • D
    4% (2)

Explanation

The issue is caused by the policy expression of the no_chunk_pol being true' and NOT HTTP.REQ.IS_VALID'. This means that the policy will always be true and thus, always be invoked, preventing the other policy from being used. This is explained in the Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 7 Deployment and Administration (CWS-215) course, under the section "Load Balancing Virtual Server Rewrite Policy Binding".

Topics

#rewrite policy#GotoExpression#policy chaining#policy expression logic

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 1Y0-204 Practice