nerdexam
CIW

1D0-61A · Question #34

You are expecting a very important file from a co-worker in a remote office to be sent to you through e-mail. You finally call the co-worker and tell him that you have not received the file. He…

The correct answer is C. File attachments with an .exe extension may contain malicious code. Executable files (.exe) are one of the most common vectors for malware delivery, so virtually all modern email security systems and spam filters automatically quarantine or block messages containing .exe attachments - this is standard policy, not a coincidence. Option A is…

Cybersecurity and IT Ethics

Question

You are expecting a very important file from a co-worker in a remote office to be sent to you through e-mail. You finally call the co-worker and tell him that you have not received the file. He informs you that he sent the file yesterday, but will send it again immediately. After some time, you still have not received his e-mail message. You contact the Technical Support department and ask them for help. After some investigation, Technical Support finds the e-mail from your coworker with an attachment named salesnumbers.exe in the spam folder of your e-mail client. What is the most likely reason that the e-mail message was filtered out?

Options

  • AMessages from remote offices are blocked on internal e-mail.
  • BThe attachment's file size exceeds the size limits of the e-mail filter policy.
  • CFile attachments with an .exe extension may contain malicious code.
  • DThe file name of the attached file exceeds the file name length of the filter policy.

How the community answered

(32 responses)
  • A
    3% (1)
  • C
    91% (29)
  • D
    6% (2)

Explanation

Executable files (.exe) are one of the most common vectors for malware delivery, so virtually all modern email security systems and spam filters automatically quarantine or block messages containing .exe attachments - this is standard policy, not a coincidence. Option A is wrong because internal corporate email systems don't routinely block messages between offices; that would break normal business communication. Option B is unlikely because the filter specifically flagged the attachment type, not its size, and size limits would typically bounce the message back with an error rather than silently route it to spam. Option D is implausible because file name length restrictions are not a real-world email filtering mechanism - no standard spam policy filters on how long a file name is.

Memory tip: Think "EXE = Execute = Executable = Possible malware." Spam filters are trained to treat .exe files as suspicious by default because they can run arbitrary code on the recipient's machine - unlike .pdf or .docx files, an .exe requires no additional application to cause harm once opened.

Topics

#Email filtering#File attachments#Executable files#Malware risk

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 1D0-61A Practice