After failing an audit twice, an organization has been ordered by a government regulatory agency to pay fines. Which of the following causes this action?

Question

Options

• ANon-compliance
• BContract violations
• CGovernment sanctions
• DRules of engagement

• A
  95% (20)
• B
  5% (1)

Explanation

Non-compliance (A) is correct because the organization repeatedly failed audits - meaning it did not meet the regulatory standards required by the governing body - which triggered financial penalties. Regulatory agencies impose fines specifically as a consequence of failing to comply with established rules or standards.

Contract violations (B) refer to breaches of a specific agreement between two parties, not a government-mandated audit failure - the scenario describes a regulatory relationship, not a contractual one. Government sanctions (C) is a distractor because sanctions are themselves the result of non-compliance (the fines), not the cause of them - the question asks what causes the action, not what the action is. Rules of engagement (D) is a security/military term defining the boundaries of acceptable conduct during an operation, entirely unrelated to regulatory audits.

Memory tip: Think "audit fail → compliance fail → fine." The cause is always the missing compliance; the fine is just the consequence. If you see audit + penalty on the exam, the root cause is always non-compliance.

No community discussion yet for this question.