SY0-501 · Question #89
Joe, the security administrator, sees this in a vulnerability scan report: "The server 10.1.2.232 is running Apache 2.2.20 which may be vulnerable to a mod_cgi exploit." Joe verifies that the mod_cgi
The correct answer is D. a false positive.. A vulnerability scan reported a potential exploit, but the administrator confirmed the underlying module was disabled, meaning the reported vulnerability did not actually exist in an exploitable state. This situation is an example of a false positive.
Question
Joe, the security administrator, sees this in a vulnerability scan report:
"The server 10.1.2.232 is running Apache 2.2.20 which may be vulnerable to a mod_cgi exploit." Joe verifies that the mod_cgi module is not enabled on 10.1.2.232. This message is an example of:
Options
- Aa threat.
- Ba risk.
- Ca false negative.
- Da false positive.
How the community answered
(62 responses)- A8% (5)
- B3% (2)
- C13% (8)
- D76% (47)
Why each option
A vulnerability scan reported a potential exploit, but the administrator confirmed the underlying module was disabled, meaning the reported vulnerability did not actually exist in an exploitable state. This situation is an example of a false positive.
A threat is a potential danger that could exploit a vulnerability, but the message itself, once verified as non-exploitable, is not the threat; rather, the potential exploit was the threat. The message describes a finding, not a threat itself.
A risk is the potential for loss or damage when a threat exploits a vulnerability, but since the mod_cgi module is disabled, the specific risk associated with this exploit is mitigated or non-existent, making the message an incorrect identification rather than a risk itself.
A false negative occurs when a security scan fails to detect an actual vulnerability that exists, which is the opposite of the scenario where a non-existent vulnerability was reported.
A false positive occurs when a security scanner or detection system incorrectly identifies a vulnerability or threat that does not actually exist or is not exploitable in the given environment. In this case, the scan reported a potential mod_cgi exploit, but the administrator confirmed that the mod_cgi module was not enabled, rendering the potential exploit non-existent or irrelevant for this specific server configuration.
Concept tested: Vulnerability scan results interpretation; false positives
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/manage-false-positives-negatives?view=o365-worldwide
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.