SY0-501 · Question #538
Which of the following scenarios BEST describes an implementation of non-repudiation?
The correct answer is C. A user sends a digitally signed email to the entire finance department about an upcoming meeting. Non-repudiation is a security service that provides undeniable proof of the origin and integrity of data, preventing a sender from falsely denying they sent a message or that the message was altered.
Question
Which of the following scenarios BEST describes an implementation of non-repudiation?
Options
- AA user logs into a domain workstation and access network file shares for another department
- BA user remotely logs into the mail server with another user's credentials
- CA user sends a digitally signed email to the entire finance department about an upcoming meeting
- DA user access the workstation registry to make unauthorized changes to enable functionality
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A4% (1)
- B9% (2)
- C83% (19)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
Non-repudiation is a security service that provides undeniable proof of the origin and integrity of data, preventing a sender from falsely denying they sent a message or that the message was altered.
This scenario describes authentication and authorization for accessing resources, which is not an implementation of non-repudiation itself.
This scenario describes a security breach related to unauthorized access and impersonation, not a mechanism for ensuring non-repudiation.
A digitally signed email uses the sender's private key to create a unique cryptographic signature, which proves the sender's identity and the message's integrity; this cryptographic evidence prevents the sender from later denying they sent the email.
This scenario describes unauthorized system modification and a security violation, which is unrelated to implementing non-repudiation.
Concept tested: Non-repudiation with digital signatures
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/security/what-is-nonrepudiation
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.