SY0-501 · Question #274
An information system owner has supplied a new requirement to the development team that calls for increased non-repudiation within the application. After undergoing several audits, the owner…
The correct answer is D. Digital signatures. To address the requirement for increased non-repudiation within an application, digital signatures are the most appropriate capability as they provide verifiable proof of origin and integrity for actions or data.
Question
An information system owner has supplied a new requirement to the development team that calls for increased non-repudiation within the application. After undergoing several audits, the owner determined that current levels of non-repudiation were insufficient. Which of the following capabilities would be MOST appropriate to consider implementing is response to the new requirement?
Options
- ATransitive trust
- BSymmetric encryption
- CTwo-factor authentication
- DDigital signatures
- EOne-time passwords
How the community answered
(56 responses)- A14% (8)
- B2% (1)
- C4% (2)
- D73% (41)
- E7% (4)
Why each option
To address the requirement for increased non-repudiation within an application, digital signatures are the most appropriate capability as they provide verifiable proof of origin and integrity for actions or data.
Transitive trust describes how trust relationships extend across multiple entities in a chain, which is related to authentication and authorization but does not directly provide non-repudiation for user actions within an application.
Symmetric encryption ensures confidentiality by scrambling data but does not provide non-repudiation because both parties share the same key, making it impossible to definitively prove who performed an action.
Two-factor authentication strengthens the login process by requiring multiple verification methods but does not inherently provide non-repudiation for specific actions taken by a user within the application after successful authentication.
Digital signatures leverage asymmetric cryptography to bind an individual's unique private key to data, creating a cryptographic hash that serves as verifiable proof of origin and integrity. This mechanism ensures non-repudiation by making it technically infeasible for the signer to later deny having signed a document or performed an action, as only their private key could have created the valid signature.
One-time passwords enhance authentication by using a unique password for each session, but they do not provide non-repudiation for actions performed by the user within the application once authenticated.
Concept tested: Non-repudiation through digital signatures
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/seccrypto/digital-signatures
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.