SY0-501 · Question #201
Which of the following must be intact for evidence to be admissible in court?
The correct answer is A. Chain of custody. For evidence to be accepted in a court of law, its chain of custody must be fully documented and maintained to ensure its integrity and authenticity.
Question
Which of the following must be intact for evidence to be admissible in court?
Options
- AChain of custody
- BOrder of violation
- CLegal hold
- DPreservation
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A82% (36)
- B2% (1)
- C5% (2)
- D11% (5)
Why each option
For evidence to be accepted in a court of law, its chain of custody must be fully documented and maintained to ensure its integrity and authenticity.
Chain of custody is the documented chronological history of the evidence from the moment it is collected until it is presented in court. This meticulous record-keeping proves that the evidence has not been tampered with, substituted, or altered, which is essential for proving its authenticity and ensuring its admissibility.
Order of violation is not a recognized legal or forensic term related to the admissibility of evidence in court.
A legal hold is a process to preserve evidence when litigation is anticipated, but it does not inherently guarantee admissibility; the preserved evidence still requires an intact chain of custody.
Preservation is a necessary step in handling evidence, but it is a component of maintaining the chain of custody, which specifically provides the documented history required for admissibility.
Concept tested: Evidence admissibility and chain of custody
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chain_of_custody
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.