SY0-301 · Question #230
A security administrator is responsible for performing periodic reviews of user permission settings due to high turnover and internal transfers at a corporation. Which of the following BEST…
The correct answer is A. Review all user permissions and group memberships to ensure only the minimum set of permissions. Periodic user permission reviews ensure that each user retains only the minimum access needed for their current role, correcting privilege creep caused by turnover and internal transfers. This practice enforces the principle of least privilege.
Question
A security administrator is responsible for performing periodic reviews of user permission settings due to high turnover and internal transfers at a corporation. Which of the following BEST describes the procedure and security rationale for performing such reviews?
Options
- AReview all user permissions and group memberships to ensure only the minimum set of permissions
- BReview the permissions of all transferred users to ensure new permissions are granted so the employee
- CEnsure all users have adequate permissions and appropriate group memberships, so the volume of
- DEnsure former employee accounts have no permissions so that they cannot access any network file stores
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A75% (46)
- B15% (9)
- C3% (2)
- D7% (4)
Why each option
Periodic user permission reviews ensure that each user retains only the minimum access needed for their current role, correcting privilege creep caused by turnover and internal transfers. This practice enforces the principle of least privilege.
Reviewing all user permissions and group memberships against current job responsibilities ensures that only the minimum necessary access is maintained, directly implementing the principle of least privilege. High turnover and internal transfers create situations where users accumulate permissions from previous roles that are never revoked, increasing the organization's exposure to insider threats and data breaches. By periodically auditing and revoking excess permissions, the administrator reduces the potential blast radius of a compromised or malicious account.
Reviewing only transferred users addresses a subset of the problem but ignores permissions accumulated by users who have not recently transferred, leaving privilege creep unaddressed for a large portion of the user population.
Ensuring users have adequate permissions focuses on access sufficiency rather than access minimization, which contradicts the security rationale of least privilege and could result in over-provisioned accounts being left unchanged.
Focusing exclusively on former employee accounts addresses account termination procedures but ignores the broader privilege creep problem affecting active employees who have changed roles or accumulated excess rights over time.
Concept tested: Periodic access reviews enforcing least privilege
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/access-reviews-overview
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.