SY0-301 · Question #204
A network analyst received a number of reports that impersonation was taking place on the network. Session tokens were deployed to mitigate this issue and defend against which of the following…
The correct answer is A. Replay. Session tokens mitigate replay attacks by ensuring captured authentication credentials or tokens cannot be reused by an attacker.
Question
A network analyst received a number of reports that impersonation was taking place on the network. Session tokens were deployed to mitigate this issue and defend against which of the following attacks?
Options
- AReplay
- BDDoS
- CSmurf
- DPing of Death
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A86% (25)
- B7% (2)
- C3% (1)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
Session tokens mitigate replay attacks by ensuring captured authentication credentials or tokens cannot be reused by an attacker.
A replay attack occurs when an attacker intercepts a valid authentication token or credential and resubmits it to impersonate a legitimate user. Session tokens that are time-limited, one-time-use, or cryptographically bound to the session prevent reuse of captured tokens, directly neutralizing replay attacks.
A DDoS attack floods a target with traffic to exhaust resources; session tokens do not mitigate volumetric attacks.
A Smurf attack is an ICMP amplification attack targeting network infrastructure, not session-based impersonation.
A Ping of Death exploits oversized ICMP packets to crash systems and is unrelated to session token impersonation.
Concept tested: Session token defense against replay attacks
Source: https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Replay_Attack
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.