Why would a memory dump be admissible as evidence in court?

Question

Options

• ABecause it is used to demonstrate the truth of the contents.
• BBecause it is used to identify the state of the system.
• CBecause the state of the memory cannot be used as evidence.
• DBecause of the exclusionary rule.

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  87% (26)
• C
  7% (2)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

A memory dump would be admissible as evidence because it is used to identify the state of the system at a specific point in time - not to prove the truth of any contents within it. This distinction is critical: evidence offered to prove the truth of what it contains is hearsay, but evidence offered to show the state or condition of something (e.g., what processes were running, what data was in RAM, what connections were active) is admissible for that demonstrative purpose. Choice A is wrong because offering it to prove truth of contents would make it hearsay. Choice C is false - system state absolutely can be evidence. Choice D is wrong because the exclusionary rule would limit admissibility, not support it.

No community discussion yet for this question.