SOFA-CFE · Question #382
_____________ is a more difficult problem when the ghost is a former employee who was simply not removed from the payroll.
The correct answer is A. Distribution. Distribution (A) is correct because the problem of distributing fraudulent paychecks is significantly harder to detect when the ghost is a former employee. A former employee has a legitimate name, valid Social Security number, real address or bank account on file, and an…
Question
_____________ is a more difficult problem when the ghost is a former employee who was simply not removed from the payroll.
Options
- ADistribution
- BDisbursement
- CCash out
- DPaycheck
How the community answered
(53 responses)- A75% (40)
- B4% (2)
- C13% (7)
- D8% (4)
Explanation
Distribution (A) is correct because the problem of distributing fraudulent paychecks is significantly harder to detect when the ghost is a former employee. A former employee has a legitimate name, valid Social Security number, real address or bank account on file, and an established payroll history - all of which make the fraudulent payments blend in naturally with legitimate ones.
B (Disbursement) is wrong because disbursement refers broadly to any outgoing payment of funds; distribution is the more precise term for physically routing paychecks or direct deposits to recipients, which is the specific control point that breaks down in this scenario.
C (Cash out) is wrong because it is not a standard payroll audit or fraud examination term - it describes converting an asset to cash generally, not a category of payroll control failure.
D (Paycheck) is wrong because a paycheck is simply the instrument of payment, not the name of the control problem or fraud risk category being described.
Memory tip: Think of the word distribute as "getting the check to the right person." A former employee already has a legitimate route - real bank account, real address - so the fraudulent check distributes just like a real one, making it the hardest ghost to catch.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.