nerdexam
SOFE

SOFA-CFE · Question #124

Annual Statement methodology should be followed in computing insurance company taxable income except when the tax law does not permit insurers to do so.

The correct answer is A. true. A is correct because U.S. tax law explicitly adopts the Annual Statement (statutory accounting) as the default framework for computing insurance company taxable income under IRC §832 (property/casualty) and §807 (life insurance). Congress intentionally anchored insurance…

Question

Annual Statement methodology should be followed in computing insurance company taxable income except when the tax law does not permit insurers to do so.

Options

  • Atrue
  • BFalse

How the community answered

(44 responses)
  • A
    73% (32)
  • B
    27% (12)

Explanation

A is correct because U.S. tax law explicitly adopts the Annual Statement (statutory accounting) as the default framework for computing insurance company taxable income under IRC §832 (property/casualty) and §807 (life insurance). Congress intentionally anchored insurance taxation to statutory accounting rather than GAAP, so Annual Statement methodology governs unless a specific tax code provision overrides it.

B is wrong because the statement is not false - this "conformity principle" is a foundational rule of insurance taxation. Rejecting it would mischaracterize how the IRS treats insurer accounting; statutory reserves, unearned premiums, and loss reserves are all computed using Annual Statement rules as the starting point.

Memory tip: Think of Annual Statement methodology as the "default setting" for insurance tax - it stays on unless Congress flips a specific switch (i.e., a tax law provision that deviates). The exceptions prove the rule, not replace it.

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SOFA-CFE Practice