SOA-C02 · Question #335
A global gaming company is preparing to launch a new game on AWS. The game runs in multiple AWS Regions on a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances. The instances are in an Auto Scaling group behind an…
The correct answer is A. Create Amazon CloudWatch alarms that monitor the health of the ALB in each Region. D. Configure Route 53 geoproximity routing Specify the Regions that are used for the infrastructure. Option B is not correct because monitoring the health of the EC2 instances is not sufficient to provide failover as the EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group and instances can be added or removed dynamically. Option C is not correct because monitoring the private IP…
Question
A global gaming company is preparing to launch a new game on AWS. The game runs in multiple AWS Regions on a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances. The instances are in an Auto Scaling group behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) in each Region. The company plans to use Amazon Route 53 for DNS services. The DNS configuration must direct users to the Region that is closest to them and must provide automated failover. Which combination of steps should a SysOps administrator take to configure Route 53 to meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Options
- ACreate Amazon CloudWatch alarms that monitor the health of the ALB in each Region.
- BCreate Amazon CloudWatch alarms that monitor the hearth of the EC2 instances in each Region.
- CConfigure Route 53 DNS failover by using a health check that monitors the private address of an
- DConfigure Route 53 geoproximity routing Specify the Regions that are used for the infrastructure.
- EConfigure Route 53 simple routing Specify the continent, country, and state or province that are
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A85% (34)
- B5% (2)
- C8% (3)
- E3% (1)
Explanation
Option B is not correct because monitoring the health of the EC2 instances is not sufficient to provide failover as the EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group and instances can be added or removed dynamically. Option C is not correct because monitoring the private IP address of an EC2 instance is not sufficient to determine the health of the infrastructure, as the instance may still be running but the application or service on the instance may be unhealthy. Option E is not correct because simple routing does not take into account geographic proximity, which is a requirement in this scenario.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.