SOA-C02 · Question #200
A SysOps administrator has launched a large general purpose Amazon EC2 instance to regularly process large data files. The instance has an attached 1 TB General Purpose SSD (gp2) Amazon Elastic Block
The correct answer is C. Increase the EBS volume to a 2 TB General Purpose SSD (gp2) volume.. Option C is correct because gp2 EBS volumes provision exactly 3 IOPS per GB of storage, meaning a 1 TB volume delivers a 3,000 IOPS baseline - precisely what CloudWatch is showing as a consistent ceiling. Doubling to 2 TB raises the baseline to 6,000 IOPS, relieving the bottlenec
Question
A SysOps administrator has launched a large general purpose Amazon EC2 instance to regularly process large data files. The instance has an attached 1 TB General Purpose SSD (gp2) Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volume. The instance also is EBS-optimized. To save costs, the SysOps administrator stops the instance each evening and restarts the instance ach morning. When data processing is active, Amazon CloudWatch metrics on the instance show a consistent 3,000 VolumeReadOps. The SysOps administrator must improve the I/O performance while ensuring data integrity. Which action will meet these requirements?
Options
- AChange the instance type to a large, burstable, general purpose instance.
- BChange the instance type to an extra large general purpose instance.
- CIncrease the EBS volume to a 2 TB General Purpose SSD (gp2) volume.
- DMove the data that resides on the EBS volume to the instance store.
How the community answered
(19 responses)- B11% (2)
- C84% (16)
- D5% (1)
Explanation
Option C is correct because gp2 EBS volumes provision exactly 3 IOPS per GB of storage, meaning a 1 TB volume delivers a 3,000 IOPS baseline - precisely what CloudWatch is showing as a consistent ceiling. Doubling to 2 TB raises the baseline to 6,000 IOPS, relieving the bottleneck while keeping data on persistent EBS storage (ensuring integrity).
Option A is wrong because burstable (T-series) instances are designed for variable, intermittent workloads, not sustained heavy I/O - they would reduce reliability for consistent processing jobs.
Option B is wrong because the instance size doesn't determine EBS IOPS; the volume is already EBS-optimized, so changing the instance type doesn't address the storage bottleneck.
Option D is wrong because instance store is ephemeral - data is wiped every time the instance is stopped, which the admin does nightly. This directly violates the data integrity requirement.
Memory tip: Burn in the gp2 formula - "3 IOPS per GB". Whenever you see CloudWatch hitting a round number like 3,000 on a 1 TB volume, that's a dead giveaway the volume is at its IOPS ceiling, and the fix is to scale the volume size up.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.