An administrator wants to achieve MAXIMUM component redundancy in a server running single quad-headed HBA. Which of the following will satisfy this goal?

Replacing with 2 dual-headed FCoE adapters means each adapter is still a single point of failure for two paths, which is less redundant than having four separate cards.

Replacing with 2 dual-headed HBAs means if one HBA fails, two paths are lost, which is not maximum component redundancy.

This configuration still includes a dual-headed HBA, creating a single point of failure for two paths, and does not achieve maximum redundancy compared to four single-headed cards.

Replacing a single quad-headed HBA with four individual single-headed HBAs provides maximum component redundancy because each HBA operates independently on a separate physical card. This means that if any single HBA card fails, only one of the four paths to storage is affected, leaving the other three fully functional.