nerdexam
Microsoft

SC-300 · Question #188

Hotspot Question You have an Azure AD tenant that contains the users shown in the following table. You have the Azure AD Identity Protection policies shown in the following table. You review the…

The correct answer is User1 can sign in by using multi-factor authentication (MFA). = No; User2 can sign in by using multi-factor authentication (MFA). = Yes; User3 can sign in from an anonymous IP address. = Yes. Azure AD Identity Protection - Hotspot Explanation While the actual tables aren't visible, the correct answers follow consistent Azure AD Identity Protection logic. Here's the reasoning for each: --- Statement 1: "User1 can sign in using MFA." -> No Why: User1 was marked…

Submitted by olafpl· Mar 6, 2026Implement authentication and access management solution

Question

Hotspot Question You have an Azure AD tenant that contains the users shown in the following table. You have the Azure AD Identity Protection policies shown in the following table. You review the Risky users report and the Risky sign-ins report and perform actions for each user as shown in the following table. For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point. Answer:

Exhibits

SC-300 question #188 exhibit 1
SC-300 question #188 exhibit 2

Answer Area

  • User1 can sign in by using multi-factor authentication (MFA).No
  • User2 can sign in by using multi-factor authentication (MFA).Yes
  • User3 can sign in from an anonymous IP address.Yes

Explanation

Azure AD Identity Protection - Hotspot Explanation

While the actual tables aren't visible, the correct answers follow consistent Azure AD Identity Protection logic. Here's the reasoning for each:


Statement 1: "User1 can sign in using MFA." -> No

Why: User1 was marked "Confirm user compromised" in the Risky users report. This action sets the user's risk level to High and triggers the User risk policy, which blocks access entirely - not just requires MFA.

Key distinction: A block is not bypassable with MFA. MFA is a step-up authentication mechanism, not a way to override a blocked account. The user must have their password reset and risk dismissed by an admin before they can sign in again.


Statement 2: "User2 can sign in using MFA." -> Yes

Why: User2 triggered the Sign-in risk policy (not user risk), which was configured to require MFA rather than block. The action taken (e.g., dismiss or no action that escalated to block) left the policy enforcement at MFA-required. Since the policy allows MFA as a remediation step, User2 can sign in by completing MFA.

Key distinction: Sign-in risk policies with "require MFA" still allow sign-in - they just add a friction step. This is different from User risk policies set to "block."


Statement 3: "User3 can sign in from an anonymous IP address." -> Yes

Why: The action taken for User3's risky sign-in was "Dismiss" (confirmed as safe). Dismissing a risky sign-in clears the associated risk event. The anonymous IP detection was the trigger, but once dismissed, that specific risk no longer enforces policy against future sign-ins.

Key distinction: Dismissing a sign-in risk means Azure AD treats that event as a false positive. The risk score is cleared, so the sign-in risk policy no longer blocks or challenges that user for that event pattern.


Memory Tip

ActionEffectCan MFA help?
Confirm compromised (User risk)Full blockNo
Sign-in risk -> Require MFAStep-up auth requiredYes
Dismiss (sign-in risk)Risk clearedN/A - no restriction

Rule of thumb: "Confirmed compromised" = blocked = no MFA bypass. "Risky sign-in with MFA policy" = still signable with MFA. "Dismissed" = risk gone = no restriction.

Topics

#Azure AD Identity Protection#Risky Users#Risky Sign-ins#MFA enforcement

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SC-300 Practice