SC-100 · Question #307
Your company has on-premises datacenters in Seattle, Chicago, and New York City. You plan to migrate the on-premises workloads to the East US Azure region. You need to design a governance solution…
The correct answer is C. the hybrid connectivity requirements. The Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) Azure landing zone conceptual architecture defines archetype-aligned management groups beneath the 'Landing Zones' management group based on hybrid connectivity requirements - specifically, whether workloads need connectivity back to…
Question
Your company has on-premises datacenters in Seattle, Chicago, and New York City. You plan to migrate the on-premises workloads to the East US Azure region. You need to design a governance solution for the management group hierarchy. The solution must be based on Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure principles and must ensure that the hierarchy aligns with the Azure landing conceptual architecture. What should you use to identify which archetype-aligned management groups to create beneath the landing zones management group?
Options
- Ageographical locations
- Bthe internal billing chargeback structure
- Cthe hybrid connectivity requirements
- Dsoftware development lifecycle (SDLC) environments
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A9% (2)
- B5% (1)
- C73% (16)
- D14% (3)
Explanation
The Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) Azure landing zone conceptual architecture defines archetype-aligned management groups beneath the 'Landing Zones' management group based on hybrid connectivity requirements - specifically, whether workloads need connectivity back to on-premises environments (e.g., via ExpressRoute or VPN). The two standard archetypes are 'Corp' (for workloads requiring hybrid connectivity to on-premises/corporate networks) and 'Online' (for workloads that are internet-facing and do not require hybrid connectivity). Since this company has existing on-premises datacenters in multiple cities, determining which workloads need hybrid connectivity is the correct criterion. Geographical locations, billing chargeback structures, and SDLC environments (dev/test/prod) may influence other governance decisions, but they are not the CAF-recommended basis for defining these specific management group archetypes.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.