nerdexam
Scaled_Agile

SAFE-SPC · Question #19

If all Agile Release Trains in a Value Stream are organized around Capabilities, they don't require cross-train coordination.

The correct answer is B. False. B is correct because organizing ARTs around Capabilities reduces some dependencies but does not eliminate cross-train coordination - Capabilities by definition span multiple ARTs and still require integration, synchronization, and shared PI Planning at the Solution Train level…

Value Stream and ART Identification

Question

If all Agile Release Trains in a Value Stream are organized around Capabilities, they don't require cross-train coordination.

Options

  • ATrue
  • BFalse

How the community answered

(25 responses)
  • A
    28% (7)
  • B
    72% (18)

Explanation

B is correct because organizing ARTs around Capabilities reduces some dependencies but does not eliminate cross-train coordination - Capabilities by definition span multiple ARTs and still require integration, synchronization, and shared PI Planning at the Solution Train level. SAFe explicitly provides Solution Train Events (such as Pre- and Post-PI Planning) precisely because cross-ART coordination remains necessary regardless of how trains are organized.

A (True) is wrong because no organizational structure removes all cross-ART dependencies in a Value Stream; shared infrastructure, architecture decisions, and end-to-end value delivery always create coordination needs.

Memory tip: Think "Capabilities cross ARTs by definition - if they didn't, they'd just be Features." The word "Capability" is your cue that Solution-level coordination is always in play.

Topics

#ART organization#Capabilities#cross-train coordination#Value Stream

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full SAFE-SPC Practice