SAA-C03 · Question #752
An ecommerce company is redesigning a web application to run on the AWS Cloud. The application needs to store static website content and must use a Microsoft SQL Server database to store customer…
The correct answer is B. Use an Amazon S3 bucket to store static content. Create an Amazon RDS for SQL Server Multi-. Amazon S3 is ideal for storing static website content because it is highly durable, scalable, and accessible from multiple Availability Zones. For the Microsoft SQL Server database, Amazon RDS for SQL Server with a Multi-AZ deployment provides high availability and automatic…
Question
An ecommerce company is redesigning a web application to run on the AWS Cloud. The application needs to store static website content and must use a Microsoft SQL Server database to store customer data. The company needs to deploy the application in a resilient way across multiple Availability Zones. Which solution will meet these requirements?
Options
- AUse an Amazon S3 bucket to store static content. Deploy an Amazon RDS Custom for SQL
- BUse an Amazon S3 bucket to store static content. Create an Amazon RDS for SQL Server Multi-
- CCreate an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) Multi-Attach volume to store static content.
- DCreate an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) Multi-Attach volume to store static content.
How the community answered
(21 responses)- A5% (1)
- B81% (17)
- C5% (1)
- D10% (2)
Explanation
Amazon S3 is ideal for storing static website content because it is highly durable, scalable, and accessible from multiple Availability Zones. For the Microsoft SQL Server database, Amazon RDS for SQL Server with a Multi-AZ deployment provides high availability and automatic failover across Availability Zones, meeting the requirement for resilience.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.