SAA-C03 · Question #73
A company currently runs an on-premises stock trading application by using Microsoft Windows Server. The company wants to migrate the application to the AWS Cloud. The company needs to design a…
The correct answer is A. Configure a Windows Server cluster that spans two Availability Zones on Amazon EC2 instances. This solution is designed to provide high availability and low-latency access to block storage across multiple Availability Zones with minimal implementation effort. Windows Server Cluster Across AZs: Configuring a Windows Server Failover Cluster (WSFC) that spans two…
Question
A company currently runs an on-premises stock trading application by using Microsoft Windows Server. The company wants to migrate the application to the AWS Cloud. The company needs to design a highly available solution that provides low-latency access to block storage across multiple Availability Zones. Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST implementation effort?
Options
- AConfigure a Windows Server cluster that spans two Availability Zones on Amazon EC2 instances.
- BConfigure a Windows Server cluster that spans two Availability Zones on Amazon EC2 instances.
- CDeploy the application on Amazon EC2 instances in two Availability Zones Configure one EC2
- DDeploy the application on Amazon EC2 instances in two Availability Zones. Configure one EC2
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A73% (16)
- B9% (2)
- C14% (3)
- D5% (1)
Explanation
This solution is designed to provide high availability and low-latency access to block storage across multiple Availability Zones with minimal implementation effort. Windows Server Cluster Across AZs: Configuring a Windows Server Failover Cluster (WSFC) that spans two Availability Zones ensures that the application can failover from one instance to another in case of a failure, meeting the high availability requirement. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx for Windows File Server provides fully managed Windows file storage that is accessible via the SMB protocol, which is suitable for Windows- based applications. It offers high availability and can be used as shared storage between the cluster nodes, ensuring that both nodes have access to the same data with low latency. Why Not Other Options? Option B (EBS with application-level replication): This requires complex configuration and management, as EBS volumes cannot be directly shared across AZs. Application-level replication is more complex and prone to errors. Option C (FSx for NetApp ONTAP with iSCSI): While this is a viable option, it introduces additional complexity with iSCSI and requires more specialized knowledge for setup and Option D (EBS with EBS-level replication): EBS-level replication is not natively supported across AZs, and setting up a custom replication solution would increase the implementation effort.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.