S90-02A · Question #81
Which type of MEP is not encouraged by the WS-I and also not supported in WSDL 2.0? Select the correct answer.
The correct answer is D. outbound. Outbound MEPs (service-initiated patterns like solicit-response and notification) are not encouraged by WS-I because they require the service to initiate communication to the client, creating practical challenges in standard network environments - and WSDL 2.0 dropped support…
Question
Which type of MEP is not encouraged by the WS-I and also not supported in WSDL 2.0? Select the correct answer.
Options
- Around-about
- Bintermediate
- Ccall-back
- Doutbound
How the community answered
(18 responses)- A6% (1)
- C6% (1)
- D89% (16)
Explanation
Outbound MEPs (service-initiated patterns like solicit-response and notification) are not encouraged by WS-I because they require the service to initiate communication to the client, creating practical challenges in standard network environments - and WSDL 2.0 dropped support for them entirely, retaining only client-initiated patterns like in-only and in-out.
Why the distractors are wrong: "Round-about" (A) and "intermediate" (B) are not recognized MEP categories in web services specifications at all - they are fabricated terms designed to mislead. "Call-back" (C) is a valid and recognized interaction pattern (the client registers an endpoint for the service to reply to) and is supported in WSDL 2.0, making it incorrect.
Memory tip: Think "Outbound = Out of luck" - when the service tries to initiate (send first), both WS-I and WSDL 2.0 say no. If the client starts the conversation, you're fine; if the service tries to start it, that's the outbound pattern that got cut.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.