PT0-001 · Question #161
A penetration tester is performing an annual security assessment for a repeat client The tester finds indicators of previous compromise Which of the following would be the most logical steps to…
The correct answer is A. Report the incident to the tester's immediate manager and follow up with the client immediately. Discovering indicators of prior compromise during a pentest is an out-of-scope incident that requires immediate escalation through the tester's management chain and notification to the client.
Question
A penetration tester is performing an annual security assessment for a repeat client The tester finds indicators of previous compromise Which of the following would be the most logical steps to follow NEXT?
Options
- AReport the incident to the tester's immediate manager and follow up with the client immediately
- BReport the incident to the clients Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) immediately and alter
- CReport the incident to the client's legal department and then follow up with the client's security
- DMake note of the anomaly, continue with the penetration testing and detail it in the final report
How the community answered
(38 responses)- A79% (30)
- B13% (5)
- C3% (1)
- D5% (2)
Why each option
Discovering indicators of prior compromise during a pentest is an out-of-scope incident that requires immediate escalation through the tester's management chain and notification to the client.
Rules of engagement and standard pentest methodology require that any discovered evidence of an active or prior compromise be escalated immediately - first to the tester's own management to maintain contractual chain of command, then directly to the client - so the client can activate their incident response plan before further damage or data loss occurs while the threat may still be active.
Contacting the client's CISO directly without first notifying the tester's own manager bypasses the contractual chain of command established in the rules of engagement and may violate the terms of the engagement.
Routing the initial notification through the client's legal department introduces significant delay when a potentially active threat demands immediate containment action.
Deferring documentation of a compromise to the final report is dangerous because an active threat actor may continue causing harm during the remaining test period, and immediate escalation is always required when live indicators of compromise are found.
Concept tested: Incident escalation procedures during penetration testing
Source: http://www.pentest-standard.org/index.php/Reporting
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.