The degree to which a manager or supervisor is able to delegate responsibility rather than trying to do everything personally is a good measure of managerial ability.

Question

Options

• ATrue
• BFalse

• A
  75% (24)
• B
  25% (8)

Explanation

Delegation as a Measure of Managerial Ability - Why A is Correct

Effective managers understand that trying to personally handle every task is unsustainable and counterproductive - it bottlenecks work, prevents team development, and signals a lack of trust. The ability to delegate responsibility demonstrates that a manager can identify the right people for tasks, communicate expectations clearly, and focus their own attention on higher-level priorities. This is widely recognized in management theory as a core competency: a manager who cannot delegate is essentially a highly-paid individual contributor, not a leader.

Why B is wrong: Saying this is false would imply that hoarding tasks or micromanaging is equally or more effective, which contradicts both organizational research and practical management experience. Inability to delegate is consistently linked to burnout, low team morale, and poor organizational performance.

Memory tip: Think of the phrase "A manager who does everything manages nothing." If a manager is always in the weeds doing tasks, they have no bandwidth left to plan, lead, or develop their team - the essential functions of the role. Delegation = trust + leverage, which is the hallmark of strong leadership.

No community discussion yet for this question.