Which two use cases are appropriate for Prisma Access SASE? (Choose two.)

Question

Options

• ASecuring remote workers and branch offices
• BEnabling secure access to cloud applications
• CImplementing wired network infrastructure
• DOverseeing traditional VPN setups

• A
  86% (38)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  9% (4)

Explanation

Prisma Access is Palo Alto Networks' cloud-delivered SASE solution, purpose-built to secure remote workers (A) and branch offices connecting to cloud apps (B) - these are its core design goals. SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) converges networking and security in the cloud, making it ideal for distributed workforces and SaaS/cloud application access without backhauling traffic through a data center.

C is wrong because Prisma Access is a cloud-delivered security service, not a wired network infrastructure product - that falls under switching/LAN solutions like Palo Alto's Prisma SD-WAN or traditional campus networking gear.

D is wrong because Prisma Access replaces traditional VPN setups rather than overseeing them - it delivers Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) as a modern alternative to legacy VPN architectures.

Memory tip: Think "SASE = cloud security for people and places connecting to the cloud" - remote users and branch offices going up to cloud apps. If an answer implies old-school on-prem infrastructure (wired networks, managing legacy VPNs), it's a distractor.

No community discussion yet for this question.