Which two key benefits have been identified for a customer investing in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma secure access service edge (SASE) solution? (Choose two.)

Question

Options

• Adecreased likelihood of a data breach
• Breduced input required from management during third-party investigations
• Cdecreased need for interaction between branches
• Dreduced number of security incidents requiring manual investigation

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  93% (37)
• C
  5% (2)

Explanation

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE delivers centralized logging and automated reporting, which means third-party auditors and investigators can access the data they need directly - reducing the back-and-forth burden on management (B). Its AI/ML-driven threat detection and automated policy enforcement also significantly reduces alert volume, meaning fewer security events escalate to incidents that require a human to manually triage or investigate (D).

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is tempting but imprecise - no vendor can guarantee a decreased likelihood of a breach; SASE improves detection and response, not breach probability per se.
• C is a fabricated benefit - SASE is designed to enable secure branch interaction, not reduce the need for it; fewer branch interactions would be a business design choice, not a SASE outcome.

Memory tip: Both correct answers share the word "reduced" and both relate to investigation burden - one external (management's input to third-party investigations) and one internal (manual security incident handling). Link them with the phrase: "SASE reduces investigation work, inside and outside."

No community discussion yet for this question.