PSE-PLATFORM · Question #314
Which three user authentication services can be modified to provide the Palo Alto Networks NGFW with both usernames and role names? (Choose three.)
The correct answer is A. TACACS+ D. LDAP F. RADIUS. TACACS+, LDAP, and RADIUS are the three correct answers because each supports returning both a username and role/group attributes that PAN-OS can map to admin role profiles. RADIUS accomplishes this through Vendor-Specific Attributes (VSAs), TACACS+ returns role data in its…
Question
Which three user authentication services can be modified to provide the Palo Alto Networks NGFW with both usernames and role names? (Choose three.)
Options
- ATACACS+
- BKerberos
- CPAP
- DLDAP
- ESAML
- FRADIUS
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A92% (36)
- C5% (2)
- E3% (1)
Explanation
TACACS+, LDAP, and RADIUS are the three correct answers because each supports returning both a username and role/group attributes that PAN-OS can map to admin role profiles. RADIUS accomplishes this through Vendor-Specific Attributes (VSAs), TACACS+ returns role data in its authorization response, and LDAP allows the NGFW to query group memberships alongside user identity.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- Kerberos (B): Handles authentication via tickets but has no native mechanism to return role or group attributes to the NGFW.
- PAP (C): A bare-bones credential transport protocol - it only carries a username and password with no support for role data whatsoever.
- SAML (E): While SAML can carry attributes and is supported for GlobalProtect/management auth, it is not one of the three modifiable server profile types used to deliver role names in the classic PAN-OS authentication/authorization flow tested here.
Memory tip: Think "RAT-L" - RADIUS, Admin-via-TACACS+, LDAP. These are the three full AAA or directory services; the wrong answers (Kerberos, PAP, SAML) are either pure authentication protocols or a federation standard that lacks the two-way attribute-return mechanism PAN-OS relies on for role assignment.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.