nerdexam
Google

PROFESSIONAL-CLOUD-NETWORK-ENGINEER · Question #137

You are planning a large application deployment in Google Cloud that includes on-premises connectivity. The application requires direct connectivity between workloads in all regions and on- premises…

The correct answer is D. Use non-RFC 1918 ranges with a single global VPC. When on-premises RFC 1918 IP ranges are exhausted and direct, non-NAT connectivity is required across all regions and on-premises locations, using non-RFC 1918 ranges with a single global VPC is the optimal solution.

Submitted by tom_us· Apr 18, 2026Designing, planning, and prototyping a Google Cloud network

Question

You are planning a large application deployment in Google Cloud that includes on-premises connectivity. The application requires direct connectivity between workloads in all regions and on- premises locations without address translation, but all RFC 1918 ranges are already in use in the on-premises locations. What should you do?

Options

  • AUse multiple VPC networks with a transit network using VPC Network Peering.
  • BUse overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks.
  • CUse overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks and Cloud NAT.
  • DUse non-RFC 1918 ranges with a single global VPC.

How the community answered

(53 responses)
  • A
    4% (2)
  • B
    6% (3)
  • C
    13% (7)
  • D
    77% (41)

Why each option

When on-premises RFC 1918 IP ranges are exhausted and direct, non-NAT connectivity is required across all regions and on-premises locations, using non-RFC 1918 ranges with a single global VPC is the optimal solution.

AUse multiple VPC networks with a transit network using VPC Network Peering.

Using multiple VPC networks with a transit network via VPC Network Peering addresses inter-VPC connectivity but does not solve the fundamental issue of exhausted RFC 1918 ranges on-premises or provide unique non-overlapping IP spaces if new VPCs also use RFC 1918 ranges that clash.

BUse overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks.

Using overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks explicitly violates the requirement for 'direct connectivity between workloads... without address translation' because overlapping IP spaces would necessitate network address translation (NAT) or other complex routing solutions.

CUse overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks and Cloud NAT.

Using overlapping RFC 1918 ranges with multiple isolated VPC networks and Cloud NAT introduces address translation, which directly contradicts the requirement for connectivity 'without address translation'.

DUse non-RFC 1918 ranges with a single global VPC.Correct

If all RFC 1918 address ranges are in use on-premises and the requirement is for direct connectivity without address translation, Google Cloud allows the use of non-RFC 1918 (publicly routable) IP address ranges for VPC networks. Implementing these non-RFC 1918 ranges within a single global VPC ensures unique, non-overlapping private IP spaces for Google Cloud resources and enables direct communication with on-premises locations and across all regions without needing NAT.

Concept tested: Non-RFC 1918 IP ranges for VPCs

Source: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/using-non-rfc-1918-ip-addresses

Topics

#Hybrid Connectivity#IP Addressing#VPC Networking#Network Design

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PROFESSIONAL-CLOUD-NETWORK-ENGINEER Practice