PL-300 Question #367: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

Question

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Power BI report that imports a date table and a sales table from an Azure SQL database data source. The sales table has the following date foreign keys: - Due Date - Order Date - Delivery Date You need to support the analysis of sales over time based on all three dates at the same time. Solution: From the Fields pane, you rename the date table as Due Date. You use a DAX expression to create Order Date and Delivery Date as calculated tables. You create active relationships between the sales table and each date table. Does this meet the goal?

Options

• AYes
• BNo

Explanation

Renaming a date table to align with a specific date foreign key in a sales table helps clarify its primary relationship and supports analysis for that specific date dimension.

Common mistakes.

• B. The act of renaming the table to 'Due Date' establishes or clarifies its role for one of the date dimensions, which is a step in enabling analysis for that specific date field, thus partially meeting the goal of supporting analysis across multiple date dimensions.

Concept tested. Date dimension role-playing relationships

Reference. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/guidance/star-schema#date-table-role-playing-dimensions

No community discussion yet for this question.