A customer wants to combine multiple Ethernet interfaces into a single virtual interface using link aggregation. Which two formats are correct for naming aggregate interfaces? (Choose two.)

The correct answer is A. ae.8 C. ae.1. In PAN-OS, aggregate Ethernet interfaces use the naming prefix 'ae' followed by a period and a number (e.g., ae.1, ae.8). The prefix 'aggregate' is not a valid PAN-OS interface naming convention. Both ae.1 and ae.8 are valid aggregate interface names, so options A and C are…

Submitted by carlos_mx· Apr 18, 2026Deploy and Configure

Question

Options

Aae.8
Baggregate.1
Cae.1
Daggregate.8

How the community answered

(27 responses)

A
89% (24)
B
4% (1)
D
7% (2)

Explanation

In PAN-OS, aggregate Ethernet interfaces use the naming prefix 'ae' followed by a period and a number (e.g., ae.1, ae.8). The prefix 'aggregate' is not a valid PAN-OS interface naming convention. Both ae.1 and ae.8 are valid aggregate interface names, so options A and C are correct. Options B and D use 'aggregate.' which does not conform to PAN-OS interface naming standards.

Topics

#Link Aggregation#Interface Naming#Aggregate Ethernet#Network Interfaces

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PCNSE Practice