PAS-C01 · Question #97
A company is running its on-premises SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) workload on SAP HANA. The company wants to perform SAP S/4HANA conversion of the on-premises SAP ECC on SAP HANA landscape…
The correct answer is B. Perform SAP S/4HANA conversion and migration of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system to AWS C. Perform migration of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system to AWS by using SAP HANA system. Two valid paths exist for this migration. Option B uses SAP Software Update Manager (SUM) Database Migration Option (DMO) with System Move, which simultaneously performs the SAP ECC to S/4HANA conversion and migrates the database from the on-premises environment to AWS…
Question
A company is running its on-premises SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) workload on SAP HANA. The company wants to perform SAP S/4HANA conversion of the on-premises SAP ECC on SAP HANA landscape and migrate to AWS. Which solutions can the company use to meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Options
- APerform SAP S/4HANA conversion of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system by using SAP Software
- BPerform SAP S/4HANA conversion and migration of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system to AWS
- CPerform migration of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system to AWS by using SAP HANA system
- DPerform SAP S/4HANA conversion of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system by using SAP Software
- EPerform SAP S/4HANA conversion of the SAP ECC on SAP HANA system by using SAP Software
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A5% (2)
- B82% (32)
- D3% (1)
- E10% (4)
Explanation
Two valid paths exist for this migration. Option B uses SAP Software Update Manager (SUM) Database Migration Option (DMO) with System Move, which simultaneously performs the SAP ECC to S/4HANA conversion and migrates the database from the on-premises environment to AWS - reducing downtime and combining two steps into one. Option C uses SAP HANA System Replication to first replicate the on-premises SAP HANA database to AWS, minimizing data transfer downtime, after which the S/4HANA conversion can be performed on AWS. Together, these two approaches represent the supported and efficient methods for combining database migration to AWS with a system conversion. Other options either perform conversion only on-premises without a migration path, or use unsupported/inefficient combinations.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.