nerdexam
Amazon

PAS-C01 · Question #88

A company is planning to implement a new SAP workload on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on AWS. The company needs to use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to encrypt every file at rest. The company…

The correct answer is C. Create a symmetric KMS customer managed key in the production account. Create Amazon. Amazon EFS encryption at rest uses AES-256 symmetric encryption and therefore requires a symmetric KMS customer managed key (CMK) - asymmetric keys (Options A and D) are incompatible with EFS. A symmetric CMK created in the production account can have a key policy that grants…

Design of SAP Workloads on AWS

Question

A company is planning to implement a new SAP workload on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on AWS. The company needs to use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to encrypt every file at rest. The company also requires that its production SAP workloads and non-production SAP workloads are separated into different AWS accounts. The production account and the non-production account share a common SAP transport directory, /usr/sap/trans. The two accounts are connected by VPC peering. What should the company do to achieve the data encryption at rest for the new SAP workload?

Options

  • ACreate an asymmetric KMS customer managed key in the production account. Create Amazon
  • BCreate a symmetric KMS customer managed key in the production account. Create Amazon
  • CCreate a symmetric KMS customer managed key in the production account. Create Amazon
  • DCreate an asymmetric KMS customer managed key in the production account. Create Amazon

How the community answered

(56 responses)
  • A
    13% (7)
  • B
    5% (3)
  • C
    80% (45)
  • D
    2% (1)

Explanation

Amazon EFS encryption at rest uses AES-256 symmetric encryption and therefore requires a symmetric KMS customer managed key (CMK) - asymmetric keys (Options A and D) are incompatible with EFS. A symmetric CMK created in the production account can have a key policy that grants cross-account access, allowing the non-production account to use the same EFS transport directory (/usr/sap/trans) over the existing VPC peering connection. Option B differs from C in the details of how the EFS resource policy or mount target is configured to allow cross-account access; Option C correctly combines symmetric key type with the appropriate cross-account EFS share configuration needed to satisfy both the encryption and shared transport directory requirements.

Topics

#AWS KMS#Amazon EFS#Data Encryption at Rest#Cross-Account Architecture

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full PAS-C01 Practice