PAS-C01 · Question #47
A global company is planning to migrate its SAP S/4HANA workloads and SAP BW/4HANA workloads to AWS. The company's database will not grow more than 3 TB for the next 3 years. The company's…
The correct answer is B. Maintain HA with SAP HANA system replication configured with SYNC mode and table preload. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sap/latest/sap-hana/hana-ops-ha-dr-hsr.html
Question
A global company is planning to migrate its SAP S/4HANA workloads and SAP BW/4HANA workloads to AWS. The company's database will not grow more than 3 TB for the next 3 years. The company's production SAP HANA system has been designed for high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR) with the following configurations:
- HA: SAP HANA system replication configured with SYNC mode and
LOGREPLAY operation mode across two Availability Zones with the same size SAP HANA node
- DR: SAP HANA system replication configured with ASYNC mode and
LOGREPLAY operation mode across AWS Regions with the same size SAP HANA node All the SAP HANA nodes in the current configuration are the same size. For HA, the company wants an RPO of 0 and an RTO of 5 minutes. For DR, the company wants an RPO of 0 and an RTO of 3 hours. How should the company design this solution to meet the RPO and RTO requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Options
- AMaintain HA with SAP HANA system replication configured with SYNC mode and table preload
- BMaintain HA with SAP HANA system replication configured with SYNC mode and table preload
- CMaintain HA with SAP HANA system replication across two Availability Zones. Decrease the size
- DMaintain HA with SAP HANA system replication across two Availability Zones. Decrease the size
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A29% (10)
- B51% (18)
- C11% (4)
- D9% (3)
Explanation
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sap/latest/sap-hana/hana-ops-ha-dr-hsr.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.