PAS-C01 · Question #20
A company is planning to migrate its SAP workloads to AWS. The company will use two VPCs. One VPC will be for production systems, and one VPC will be for non-production systems. The company will…
The correct answer is B. Establish a VPC peering connection between the two VPCs. Add the appropriate routes in the. VPC peering is the most cost-effective solution for connecting two VPCs. AWS does not charge for data transfer between instances in the same Availability Zone over a VPC peering connection. Since the question states that non-production systems and the primary production nodes…
Question
A company is planning to migrate its SAP workloads to AWS. The company will use two VPCs. One VPC will be for production systems, and one VPC will be for non-production systems. The company will host the non-production systems and the primary node of all the production systems in the same Availability Zone. What is the MOST cost-effective way to establish a connection between the production systems and the non-production systems?
Options
- ACreate an AWS Transit Gateway. Attach the VPCs to the transit gateway. Add the appropriate
- BEstablish a VPC peering connection between the two VPCs. Add the appropriate routes in the
- CCreate an internet gateway in each VPUse an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection between the two
- DSet up an AWS Direct Connect connection between the two VPCs. Add the appropriate routes in
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A2% (1)
- B79% (33)
- C14% (6)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
VPC peering is the most cost-effective solution for connecting two VPCs. AWS does not charge for data transfer between instances in the same Availability Zone over a VPC peering connection. Since the question states that non-production systems and the primary production nodes are all hosted in the same Availability Zone, data transfer costs between the peered VPCs would be zero, making this the cheapest option. AWS Transit Gateway (A) incurs per-hour attachment fees and per-GB data processing charges, making it more expensive and better suited for connecting many VPCs. Using internet gateways with Site-to-Site VPN (C) adds complexity and cost. AWS Direct Connect (D) is designed for on-premises-to-AWS connectivity and is expensive and unnecessary for VPC-to-VPC communication.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.