PAS-C01 · Question #135
A company that has SAP workloads on premises plans to migrate an SAP environment to AWS. The company is new to AWS and has no prior setup. The company has the following requirements: - The application
The correct answer is B. Set up an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection between the company's on-premises network and D. Separate the application server and the database server by using different subnets and network. For SAP migration with isolated servers, internet-accessible SAP systems, and minimized inter-server communication costs, Site-to-Site VPN and subnet-level isolation are the correct combination.
Question
A company that has SAP workloads on premises plans to migrate an SAP environment to AWS. The company is new to AWS and has no prior setup. The company has the following requirements:
- The application server and database server must be placed in isolated
network configurations.
- SAP systems must be accessible to the on-premises end users over the
internet.
- The cost of communications between the application server and the
database server must be minimized. Which combination of steps should an SAP solutions architect take to meet these requirements? (Choose two.)
Options
- AConfigure a Network Load Balancer for incoming connections from end users.
- BSet up an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection between the company's on-premises network and
- CSeparate the application server and the database server by using different VPCs.
- DSeparate the application server and the database server by using different subnets and network
- ESet up an AWS Direct Connect connection with a private VIF between the company's on-premises
How the community answered
(53 responses)- A17% (9)
- B70% (37)
- C8% (4)
- E6% (3)
Why each option
For SAP migration with isolated servers, internet-accessible SAP systems, and minimized inter-server communication costs, Site-to-Site VPN and subnet-level isolation are the correct combination.
A Network Load Balancer distributes incoming traffic to multiple targets and does not provide the site-to-site connectivity needed for on-premises users to reach SAP systems in AWS.
AWS Site-to-Site VPN establishes an encrypted tunnel between the on-premises network and the AWS VPC, allowing on-premises end users to securely access SAP systems hosted in AWS over the internet without publicly exposing the SAP portals.
Separating application and database servers into different VPCs requires VPC peering or Transit Gateway for inter-server communication, which adds both cost and complexity - directly conflicting with the requirement to minimize communication costs.
Placing the application server and database server in different subnets within the same VPC, separated by network ACLs, provides the required network isolation while keeping inter-server traffic within the same VPC - which is free and lower latency than cross-VPC communication.
AWS Direct Connect provides a dedicated private connection but is significantly more expensive than Site-to-Site VPN and is unnecessary for the described requirements, making it a cost-inefficient choice for a company new to AWS.
Concept tested: Site-to-Site VPN and subnet isolation for SAP on AWS
Source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpn/latest/s2svpn/VPC_VPN.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.