nerdexam
SAP

P_SECAUTH_21 · Question #17

P_SECAUTH_21 Question #17: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

The correct answer is D. Set the check indicator (for the transaction authorization called by the MM01 transaction) to NO,. This is one of the ways that the security administrator can resolve the issue and still provide the user with the needed access to MM50. Transaction SE97 is a tool that allows you to maintain check indicators for called transactions, which determine whether an authority check for

Question

The security administrator is troubleshooting authorization errors using transaction SU53. While running transaction MM50, the user received the following error: "You are not authorized to use transaction MM01 ." The user's position in the organization makes it inappropriate for them to have direct access to transaction MM01 because it creates a Segregation of Duties conflict. How can the security administrator resolve the issue and still provide the user with the needed access to MM50?

Options

  • ARemove transaction MM01 as a CALLING transaction from table TCDCOUPLES.
  • BSet the check indicator value for object S_TCODE in the SU24 data for transaction MM01 to Do
  • CSet the value for instance parameter auth/no_check_in_some_cases to N.
  • DSet the check indicator (for the transaction authorization called by the MM01 transaction) to NO,

Explanation

This is one of the ways that the security administrator can resolve the issue and still provide the user with the needed access to MM50. Transaction SE97 is a tool that allows you to maintain check indicators for called transactions, which determine whether an authority check for object S_TCODE is performed when a transaction calls another transaction. By setting the check indicator to NO for MM01 when it is called by MM50, the user can run MM50 without being authorized for MM01.

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Sign up to join the discussion
Full P_SECAUTH_21 Practice