OGBA-101 · Question #60
Consider the following modeling example, relating business capabilities to organization units so as to highlight duplication and redundancy: (Note in this example the cells colored green, yellow…
The correct answer is A. Relationship Mapping. The technique shown in the example is called relationship mapping. It is a technique that can be used to show how a business architecture addresses stakeholder concerns across different parts of an organization. It can highlight gaps or overlaps in the coverage of stakeholder…
Question
Consider the following modeling example, relating business capabilities to organization units so as to highlight duplication and redundancy:
(Note in this example the cells colored green, yellow, and red, are also marked G. Y, and R, respectively) Which of the following best describes this technique?
Exhibit
Options
- ARelationship Mapping
- BCapability Mapping
- CPerspective Analysis
- DGap Analysis
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A77% (23)
- B3% (1)
- C7% (2)
- D13% (4)
Explanation
The technique shown in the example is called relationship mapping. It is a technique that can be used to show how a business architecture addresses stakeholder concerns across different parts of an organization. It can highlight gaps or overlaps in the coverage of stakeholder concerns by a business architecture. In this case, the technique is used to relate business capabilities to organization units so as to highlight duplication and redundancy. This modeling technique is referred to as Relationship Mapping. It's used to relate business capabilities to organizational units to highlight areas of duplication and redundancy, as well as to indicate where capabilities are being performed well (green), where there are potential issues (yellow), and where there are significant problems or gaps (red). This visualization helps in understanding the alignment between organizational units and capabilities, and where improvements or changes may be needed.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
