OG0-093 · Question #339
Which of the following best describes an architectural change categorized as a re-architecting change?
The correct answer is B. A change to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation. Re-architecting is a type of architectural change that describes a significant overhaul of an existing system, often entailing increased investment to build new capabilities.
Question
Which of the following best describes an architectural change categorized as a re-architecting change?
Options
- AA change to re-align with the business strategy
- BA change to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation
- CA change to reduce costs
- DA change to derive additional value from the existing investment
How the community answered
(37 responses)- A3% (1)
- B89% (33)
- C3% (1)
- D5% (2)
Why each option
Re-architecting is a type of architectural change that describes a significant overhaul of an existing system, often entailing increased investment to build new capabilities.
Re-aligning with business strategy is a driver for many architectural changes, but not a specific description of re-architecting itself, which focuses on the nature of the change.
Re-architecting is a strategic architectural change that typically entails a substantial investment to fundamentally alter the system, thereby enabling the creation of new functionalities and unlocking additional business value for future use or expansion. This type of change goes beyond mere optimization or alignment and aims for transformative outcomes.
While cost reduction can be an outcome, it's more characteristic of optimization or rationalization efforts rather than a core descriptor of the expansive nature of re-architecting.
Deriving additional value from existing investment usually describes optimization or enhancement, not the fundamental overhaul implied by 're-architecting' which often requires new significant investment.
Concept tested: Architectural change categorization - Re-architecting
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.