A company just negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). They want to use NetApp BlueXP data services, but they have no additional budget for the rest of the year. Which two…

The correct answer is B. PayGo D. Private Offer. For companies that have negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC) and want to use NetApp BlueXP data services without additional budget for the rest of the year, two licensing models can be used: PayGo (B): This is the Pay-As-You-Go licensing model, which…

NetApp Data Fabric Integration

Question

A company just negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). They want to use NetApp BlueXP data services, but they have no additional budget for the rest of the year. Which two licensing models can the company use? (Choose two.)

Options

AKeystone
BPayGo
CBYOL
DPrivate Offer

How the community answered

(12 responses)

A
8% (1)
B
83% (10)
C
8% (1)

Explanation

For companies that have negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC) and want to use NetApp BlueXP data services without additional budget for the rest of the year, two licensing models can be used: PayGo (B): This is the Pay-As-You-Go licensing model, which allows the customer to use Azure credits from their MACC for NetApp services. It aligns with the company's desire to leverage their Azure budget without incurring additional costs. Private Offer (D): Through Azure's Private Offer model, customers can negotiate custom pricing and leverage their Azure commitment to pay for NetApp services, aligning with their existing MACC. Keystone (A) is a subscription-based model for on-premises or hybrid environments, and BYOL (C) (Bring Your Own License) requires an upfront purchase of licenses, which would not align with the company's scenario of having no additional budget.

Topics

#MACC#licensing models#PayGo#Private Offer

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full NS0-604 Practice