Network_Appliance
NS0-513 · Question #55
After manually implementing a SnapVault relationship between two volumes on two separate clusters, the primary Snapshot copies are working fine. The baseline has been transferred successfully. The…
The correct answer is A. The Snapshot copy label has not been set correctly in the used SnapMirror policy. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
After manually implementing a SnapVault relationship between two volumes on two separate clusters, the primary Snapshot copies are working fine. The baseline has been transferred successfully. The relationship is shown as healthy and idle. However, the updates are not taking place as scheduled on the secondary system. What is causing the problem? Response:
Options
- AThe Snapshot copy label has not been set correctly in the used SnapMirror policy.
- BThe SnapMirror policy schedule has not been enabled.
- CThe SnapMirror access has not been configured.
- DThe cluster peering has not been set properly.
How the community answered
(39 responses)- A85% (33)
- B3% (1)
- C8% (3)
- D5% (2)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.