NS0-157 · Question #64
In transitioning SnapVault relationships from 7-mode to clustered Data ONTAP, which statements are true? (Choose three)
The correct answer is A. You are required to re-create all Snapvault relationships with new baseline C. You can plan on fan-in relationships at the system level, many volumes to one Vserver D. You can plan on SnapMirror to SnapVault cascades. When transitioning SnapVault from 7-mode to clustered Data ONTAP: (A) is TRUE - existing SnapVault relationships cannot be migrated directly; you must re-create all SnapVault relationships with a new baseline transfer because the snapshot naming and relationship metadata differ…
Question
In transitioning SnapVault relationships from 7-mode to clustered Data ONTAP, which statements are true? (Choose three)
Options
- AYou are required to re-create all Snapvault relationships with new baseline
- BYou can plan on fan-in relationships of many source volume to one destination volume
- CYou can plan on fan-in relationships at the system level, many volumes to one Vserver
- DYou can plan on SnapMirror to SnapVault cascades
How the community answered
(52 responses)- A69% (36)
- B31% (16)
Explanation
When transitioning SnapVault from 7-mode to clustered Data ONTAP: (A) is TRUE - existing SnapVault relationships cannot be migrated directly; you must re-create all SnapVault relationships with a new baseline transfer because the snapshot naming and relationship metadata differ between 7-mode and cDOT. (C) is TRUE - clustered Data ONTAP supports fan-in at the system level, meaning multiple source volumes from different nodes can replicate to a single destination Vserver (SVM), which is an architectural advantage over 7-mode. (D) is TRUE - SnapMirror-to-SnapVault cascades are supported in cDOT, allowing a SnapMirror destination to also serve as a SnapVault source for long-term retention. (B) is FALSE - traditional fan-in of many source volumes to one destination volume is not a supported or recommended architecture; fan-in in cDOT is at the Vserver/SVM level, not the individual volume level.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.