MS-720 · Question #98
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might…
The correct answer is B. No. B is correct because the described solution navigates from the profile's perspective (opening Standard Phone Policy and viewing its assigned devices) rather than verifying the profile on the specific problematic phones directly - this is a reverse lookup that confirms which…
Question
Options
- AYes
- BNo
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A26% (6)
- B74% (17)
Explanation
B is correct because the described solution navigates from the profile's perspective (opening Standard Phone Policy and viewing its assigned devices) rather than verifying the profile on the specific problematic phones directly - this is a reverse lookup that confirms which devices are in a policy, not whether the policy is actually active and applied on individual devices.
The correct approach is to navigate to Devices > IP Phones, locate each problematic phone individually, and inspect its device details to confirm which configuration profile is assigned to it - going device-first, not profile-first.
Why A (Yes) is wrong: The navigation path described seems plausible but doesn't fulfill the goal of verifying the profile on the specific failing phones; viewing the assigned devices list from the profile side doesn't confirm the profile is correctly applied on those target devices.
Memory tip: Think of it as the difference between asking "who has this badge?" vs. "what badge does this person have?" - for troubleshooting specific phones, always start from the device, not the profile.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.