nerdexam
Microsoft

MD-102 · Question #405

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might…

The correct answer is B. No. The question is truncated, but assuming an implicit goal related to device compliance or restrictions, the partial Conditional Access policy defined (User1, Cloud apps) is insufficient to achieve such a goal without specifying device conditions or requiring compliant devices in…

Submitted by fatema_kw· Apr 18, 2026Protect devices

Question

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a user named User1 and the devices shown in the following table. User1 can access her Microsoft Exchange Online mailbox from both Device1 and Device2. You plan to create a Conditional Access policy named CAPolicy1 that will have the following settings:

  • Assignments
  • Users or workload identities: User1
  • Cloud apps or actions: Office 365 Exchange Online
  • Access controls
  • Grant: Block access

You need to configure CAPolicy1 to allow mailbox access from Device1 but block mailbox access from Device2. Solution: You add a condition that specifies trusted location. Does this meet the goal?

Options

  • AYes
  • BNo

How the community answered

(29 responses)
  • A
    41% (12)
  • B
    59% (17)

Why each option

The question is truncated, but assuming an implicit goal related to device compliance or restrictions, the partial Conditional Access policy defined (User1, Cloud apps) is insufficient to achieve such a goal without specifying device conditions or requiring compliant devices in the grant controls.

AYes

A Conditional Access policy requires specific conditions and grant controls to enforce restrictions, such as device compliance. Simply assigning the policy to a user and cloud apps is not enough to block access from non-compliant or unauthorized devices without those explicit controls.

BNoCorrect

A Conditional Access policy assigned only to a user and cloud apps, without specific device state conditions or grant controls like "Require device to be marked as compliant", will not restrict access based on the compliance or type of the device being used. Therefore, it would not achieve an implicit goal of preventing access from non-compliant or specific devices.

Concept tested: Conditional Access policy requirements

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/conditional-access/overview

Topics

#Conditional Access#Device-based conditions#Exchange Online

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full MD-102 Practice